Cohousing or not? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Chuck Maclane (chuck.maclane![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:00:00 -0700 (PDT) |
Friends, I submit the attached Wash Post account of a variation in housing structures that excludes the highly-valued architectural and member-development facets of cohousing while focusing on social/personal relationships--the latter being arguably the most valued cohousing characteristic by participants in our most recent survey study.
Do you think this community is on a dimension of cohousing or should be placed on a separate continuum?
Thanks, Chuck
Attachment:
Why I traded my pots and pans for a better social life.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-
Cohousing or not? Chuck Maclane, August 22 2016
-
Re: Cohousing or not? Boyer, Robert, August 22 2016
-
Re: Cohousing or not? Chuck Maclane, August 22 2016
- Re: Cohousing or not? Malcolm Sanford, August 26 2016
- Re: Cohousing or not? Angela Sanguinetti, August 27 2016
-
Re: Cohousing or not? Chuck Maclane, August 22 2016
-
Re: Cohousing or not? Boyer, Robert, August 22 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.